MissionOps™ Tactical Network Management Suite

A secure, enterprise-grade mission planning platform for creating, simulating, and monitoring radio and network operations.

Disclaimer

Due to the sensitive nature of this project, detailed designs and feature work cannot be shared publicly. I decided instead to include my process and work contributions in other ways. Please reach out if you have any questions or would like to discuss my work further.

Define

Problem Statment

Users managing complex radio and network operations faced fragmented tools, making it difficult to plan missions, validate scenarios, and maintain real-time operational awareness.

My Roles

  • Product Design / UX Design: Led end-to-end design of features for a mission planning SaaS platform, including workflows for mission planning and simulation

  • UX Strategy: Defined information architecture and interaction models for complex, data-dense systems

  • Collaboration: Partnered closely with product managers, engineers, and domain experts to translate operational needs into usable software

  • User Validation: Incorporated user feedback through internal reviews and iterative design refinement

Tools Used

  • Axure RP

  • Confluence

  • Jira

  • Internal Design System

  • VS Code 

Project Context

  • Professional Project (Full-time Role) at L3Harris Technologies

  • Enterprise, mission-critical SaaS platform supporting secure communications and network operations

  • Developed within a highly regulated, security-conscious environment

  • Cross-functional team including product, engineering, and subject-matter experts

Primary Users & Stakeholders

Primary Users:

  • Mission planners and operators responsible for configuring and executing communication networks

  • Technical users managing radios, networks, and location-based operations

Secondary Stakeholders:

  • Program managers and leadership overseeing mission readiness

  • Engineering teams responsible for system performance and reliability

Research

Overview

Due to confidentiality constraints, detailed research artifacts cannot be shared publicly. Research activities focused on understanding complex user workflows, operational constraints, and real-time decision-making needs.

Existing Tools & Systems Analysis

Identified usability gaps and inefficiencies

Stakeholder Interviews

Understanding mission planning and operational workflows

Design Guidelines

Synthesized findings into workflow models and design principles

Feedback & Iteration

Validated concepts through iterative reviews and internal feedback loops

Design

Design Approach

Designing feature-level experiences within a larger enterprise SaaS platform, balancing complex workflows, information architecture, and role-based access while collaborating closely with cross-functional partners and users.

Key Design Considerations

  • Feature-Based Workflows: Designing end-to-end workflows for individual features while ensuring they fit cohesively into the broader product ecosystem

  • Information Architecture: Structuring large volumes of data so users could access the right level of information based on role, task, and context

  • Progressive Disclosure: Supporting both high-level overviews and deep configuration without fragmenting the experience

  • Collaboration: Partnering closely with product, engineering, and domain experts to align usability with technical and operational constraints

  • Cross-Workflow Consistency: Maintaining a coherent mental model across planning, simulation, and monitoring modes

What I Designed

  • Feature workflows, wireframes, prototypes, and mockups for mission planning, simulation, and other application views

  • Navigation and content structures that support multiple user roles

  • Reusable design patterns aligned with internal design systems

Collaboration & Process

  • Worked in close partnership with product owners to define feature scope and requirements

  • Collaborated with engineers early to ensure designs were technically feasible and scalable

  • Incorporated feedback from subject-matter experts throughout the design process

  • Participated in regular design critiques and cross-functional reviews

Evaluate

Evaluation Strategy

Evaluation focused on validating feature workflows, information clarity, and usability for advanced and new users through iterative testing and cross-functional feedback.

Methods Used

  • Moderated usability testing on feature workflows

  • Role-based scenario testing to validate information access

  • Stakeholder and subject-matter expert walkthroughs

  • Iterative design reviews with product and engineering partners

Key Takeaways and Iterations

Predictable Navigation Patterns

Users preferred left-to-right workflows and consistently visible primary navigation, reinforcing expectations shaped by other complex software tools.

Refined navigation patterns to support left-to-right progression and persistent primary navigation

Terminology Matters

Users found certain terms unclear or inconsistent with other tools in the industry, which created friction when learning and navigating the platform.

Updated terminology to better align with industry standards and user mental models

Visual Context is Critical

Users responded strongly to visual representations that helped them understand system structure and relationships, especially when working with complex network data.

Increased emphasis on visual hierarchy and spatial representation within data-heavy features

Reflection

  1. Designing Enterprise Software Is About Systems, Not Screens

This project deepened my understanding that effective enterprise design requires thinking in systems — workflows, data models, permissions, and patterns — rather than isolated UI components.

  1. Clarity Is a Design Responsibility

From information architecture to terminology, I learned that reducing ambiguity is just as important as adding functionality, especially when users rely on consistency across tools.

  1. Collaboration Shapes Better Outcomes

Working closely with product managers, engineers, and subject-matter experts reinforced how early and continuous collaboration leads to better alignment and fewer downstream compromises.

  1. Constraints Can Strengthen Design Thinking

Security, technical limitations, and confidentiality forced more deliberate decision-making and creative problem-solving, strengthening my ability to design within real-world constraints.

  1. Iteration Builds Confidence, Not Just Usability

Repeated feedback cycles — from internal reviews to user testing — didn’t just improve the product, they increased my confidence in navigating ambiguity and advocating for design decisions.

This project sharpened my ability to design complex, high-stakes software with empathy, structure, and collaboration — skills I continue to carry into my work as a product designer.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.